Re: efficacy of LED's
- From: don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Don Klipstein)
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 04:44:06 +0000 (UTC)
In <1150576553.151718.138790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, redbelly wrote:
Victor Roberts wrote:
On 17 Jun 2006 08:22:21 -0700, "redbelly"
<redbelly98@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You need current regulation for an LED, which brings down the overall
efficacy. Not required for incandescents or cfl+ballast.
If, for example, a 20 lm/W LED becomes 15 lm/W after adding a current
regulator, then it doesn't beat a household incandescent bulb (15
lm/W).
You're assuming a current regulator with an efficiency of
only 75%. There is no reason why a good LED current
regulator cannot have an efficiency of 90% or more, which is
similar to that of high quality electronic ballasts.
The ones I've seen have roughly a 1V drop. If you run a single white
LED (3.5 V) with that, that gives a 78% efficiency. Do you know of
regulators with smaller voltage drops, or are you thinking in terms of
running strings of LED's on a single regulator?
I know of such circuits having voltage drop more like half a volt.
Consider inductive switching ones using power MOSFETs and "catch diodes"
being Schottky diodes. Along with the obvious design parameter of higher
battery voltages.
I would say that 85% efficiency of "an LED ballast" is low end of
someone trying to work at that and shaving costs by so severely as 1/10ths
of a cent, and 90% is fairly easily achievable without great cost.
- Don Klipstein (don@xxxxxxxxx)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: efficacy of LED's
- From: Peter Pan
- Re: efficacy of LED's
- References:
- efficacy of LED's
- From: RHRRC
- Re: efficacy of LED's
- From: Peter Pan
- Re: efficacy of LED's
- From: redbelly
- Re: efficacy of LED's
- From: Victor Roberts
- Re: efficacy of LED's
- From: redbelly
- efficacy of LED's
- Prev by Date: Re: efficacy of LED's
- Next by Date: Re: efficacy of LED's
- Previous by thread: Re: efficacy of LED's
- Next by thread: Re: efficacy of LED's
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|