Re: CK Patent 6967448
- From: Victor Roberts <xxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:22:21 -0500
On 25 Nov 2005 22:43:11 -0800, "rgbphil"
<philip_pulle@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Hi All,
>If this is in the wrong group....just send me on my way with directions
>please :)
>>>From the news briefs at www.ledmagazine.com I saw a notice that CK has
>a new patent granted 25 October 2005....
>http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6967448.WKU.&OS=PN/6967448&RS=PN/6967448
>Am I right in reading this, they've got a patent on flashing one of
>their RGB lights to indicate that a pattern or parameter has been
>changed?......ummm how is this patentable?
>rgbphil
This patent has a longer list of references than I have ever
seen in a US Patent. If I had nothing better to do (or if
someone was paying me my usual consulting fee) it would be
interesting to read each of the references to see what they
cover. However, I think the real issue is not that the ideas
claimed in this patent may have been patented before, but
that those ideas may have been used for many years and are
therefore in the public domain. The list of references,
however long, does not address the issue of prior use. It
will be interesting to see what happens if this patent is
challenged.
--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.
This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CK Patent 6967448
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: CK Patent 6967448
- References:
- CK Patent 6967448
- From: rgbphil
- CK Patent 6967448
- Prev by Date: Re: CK Patent 6967448
- Next by Date: Re: advice needed (long)
- Previous by thread: Re: CK Patent 6967448
- Next by thread: Re: CK Patent 6967448
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|