Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: "Peter Nachtwey" <pnachtwey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 08:54:02 -0700
"David Corliss" <dcorliss@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:LYWdnVfro-gt6MHZRVn-vA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Consider the following proposition or experiment:
| Find a small DC motor with a shaft to which you can affix a piece of
| wood, plastic, or other 'shapeable' material. In some way, shape the shaft
| attachment into a cam, that is a form which has a 'lobe' that will allow
| the LVDT armature to rise and fall some arbitrary distance when placed at
an
| appropriate position adjacent to the armature piece.
This does not provide information that allow one to ID the resolver alone.
Run the motor at
| varying speed settings and see if there are any interesting features of
the
| output variable, that is the LVDT output voltage. ...It would be useful to
| be able to measure the angular speed of the motor. This can be done with a
| simple Hall Effect device, a magnet, and an oscilloscope.
Why not use an encoder?
| If you have an A
| to D converter board, you should be able to record the LVDT voltage
waveform
| so that you can study its characteristics on a computer.
Yes, but the encoder and analog device BOTH need to be phyically measuring
the same position. No cams no springs yets. That is a different problem.
| If you do observe a significant signal characteristic at some frequency of
| the output variable, try to relate this to the characterists of a spring,
| mass damper system ... resonant frequency or whatever. Maybe you can
obtain
| values for the spring and armature mass of the LVDT, and see if they are
| relevant to your observations.
This is what you don't want if you want to ID the LVDT alone
| I guess the first question to ask is what characteristics of the output
| variable, in relation to the input, will you observe? ....
|
| ... The motivation for suggesting this scheme is that it approximates a
| fundamental systems identification experiment that is commonly used to
| characterize unknown plants.
|
| ... glad to be of assistance if possible,
| Dave
In Shay's original post he said he wants to ID the LVDT, not a mass on the
spring
or cam etc. The connection between the encoder and the LVDT must provide a
1 to 1
linkage so only the LVDT transfer function is being computed.
Everyone is dodging how one computes the transfer function.
Peter Nachtwey
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- References:
- LVDT Transfer Function
- From: Shay
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: David Corliss
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: David Corliss
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: Shay
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: miles
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: Shay
- Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- From: David Corliss
- LVDT Transfer Function
- Prev by Date: Re: Antonym of 'Executive Controller'
- Next by Date: Re: Antonym of 'Executive Controller'
- Previous by thread: Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- Next by thread: Re: LVDT Transfer Function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|