Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: Alan Kellogg <mythusmage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:14:21 -0700
In article <WyY2g.117963$oL.92988@attbi_s71>,
" George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Ken Shaw" <kshaw1967@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1145843029.101069.267760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Alan Kellogg wrote:
In article <g%L2g.698687$084.569421@attbi_s22>,
" George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Alan Kellogg" <mythusmage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mythusmage-BB9FEB.00005523042006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <KPa2g.695261$084.275927@attbi_s22>,
"George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Alan Kellogg" <mythusmage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mythusmage-5A5E43.12181821042006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <XS82g.695129$084.428317@attbi_s22>,
"George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<uraniumcommittee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1145626091.549595.57010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
George wrote:
<uraniumcommittee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1145542916.661728.317610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
George wrote:
<uraniumcommittee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1145484261.689708.43970@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Alan Kellogg wrote:
Where can I find up-to-date information on the period
of
time
leading
up
to the KT Extinction Event?
Walter Alvarez's book "T. Rex and the Crater of Doom"
I believe the question was about "up-to-date information".
Isn't
that
book
nearly ten years old?
So?
So, it is not up-to-date information. It is also not an
unbiased
view
of
the current thinking.
Seems pretty thorough to me. Can you point out significant
weak
points
in his book?
The weakest link in the book is that it is ten years old. As
such,
there
has since been tons of data collected and interpreted, a lot of
which
questions whether an impact actually caused the dinosaurs to go
extinct.
The date of the Yucatan impacter has been brought into
question - it
may
be
older than the K-T boundary event. That and the fact that the
famous
irridium layer has been found right smack in the middle of the
Deccan
traps, a fact which not only helps date the traps, but indicates
that
the
volcanism associated with them was ongoing before during and
after
the
K-T
boundary event. In other words, a lot of data has been
collected
that
dispute the impact theory of the demise of the dinosaurs, and
that
supports
the volcanism associated with the Deccan traps and the resulting
climate
change as a possible major cause. These are my major beefs with
the
book.
I'm sure there are others I've overlooked.
The fact that the largest extinction level event in geologic
history,
that
of the P-T event, is not associated with an impact, but is
associated
with
the Siberian traps weakens the impact theory for the K-T event,
and
strengthens the theory for the Deccan traps being the most
likely
cause
of
the changes which resulted in the demise of the dinosaurs and
many
other
lifeforms. Stay tuned.
George
Now, the Siberian Traps occured during major climatological
changes
caused by the formation of Pangea, thus I can't hold the Traps
entirely
responsible. Nothing so dramatic was going on when the Deccan
Traps
were
underway, except for the Chixilub impact. Thus I consider it most
likely
that the impact was contributory to the extinction event at the
K-T
Boundary, much as the formation of Pangea was contributory at the
P-T
extinction event. In either event too many severe changes too
fast for
certain species to survive.
I can't say that I agree with that assessment. Data from the
nearly
complete P-T boundary stratigraphic sections located in Greenland
appear
to
indicate severe climate changes that coincided with the production
of
the
Siberian Traps. It has been postulated that the Siberian volcanism
caused
a rise in global temperatures that was high enough to cause rapid
release
of clathrates built up on the ocean floor. The sudden release of
such
huge
quantities of methane is suggested to have resulted in a runaway
greenhouse
that caused the extinctions. In addition, the evidence suggests
that
this
happened repeatedly over an extended period of time, and very
nearly
coincided with the periodic eruptions in Siberia. That there were
two
'great dyings' that coincide or nearly coincide with the release of
massive
quantities of basaltic lava onto the Earth's surface certainly does
make
a
strong case that the events (the extinctions and the production of
prodigious amounts of lava) are linked.
George
What of the climatic changes produced by the assembly of Pangea at
or
around the same time? As I said, contributory.
I've not seen an papers that describe climate changes resulting from
the
coming together of the continents toform Pangea. Obviously, they
would
contribute to climate change in some way, but whether it would
beenough to
wipe out 95% of all species, I have a doubt. But then, neither have I
seen
the data.
I don't doubt the Siberian Traps would've produced a massive
extinction
event in and of themselves, but the contemporaneous tectonic events
surely made matters much worse.
Why? What tectonic changes could have had a more severe effect on
land and
aquatic life than the production of so much greenhouse gas, and the
resulting increase in global atmospheric and oceanic temperatures, and
how?
George
Habitat loss; coastal becomes inland, oceans currets chang,; wind
patterns change, marshes and swamps dry up, change in humidity both
local and world wide, change in sea leves, mountain building. Enough
changes to place sufficient stress on species to push them over the edge
towards extinction. Thus exaserpating the extinction event.
George, you are a tad too enamored of the Siberian Traps. They were,
after all, not the only act at that concert.
He is obsessed with the Deccan and Siberian traps. He went so far as to
deny global dimming would result from an asteroid impact in a previous
go around on whether the bolide impact was the proximate cause of the
K-T extinction.
Umm, you'll have to refresh my memory on exactly when I made that
statement, Ken. But since you brought it up, you'll have to provide some
concrete evidence that such a dimming actually occurred. Yes,
theoretically, if a large enough bolide were to strike the earth, you could
get such dimming. The question is not whether or not that is possible, but
whether or not dimming actually happened and caused the referred to
extinctions.
George
Can you show that dimming would not occur following such an event? We
are, after all, taking about mega tons (at least) of material being
thrown into the air. Followed by smoke from the fires.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: George
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- References:
- KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: Alan Kellogg
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: uraniumcommittee
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: George
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: uraniumcommittee
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: George
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: uraniumcommittee
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: George
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: Alan Kellogg
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: George
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: Alan Kellogg
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: George
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: Alan Kellogg
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: Ken Shaw
- Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- From: George
- KT Boundary Inquiry
- Prev by Date: Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- Next by Date: Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- Previous by thread: Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- Next by thread: Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|