Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- From: "cliff_lundberg@xxxxxxxxxxx" <cliff_lundberg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Apr 2006 20:05:45 -0700
I agree that 'rudimentary' isn't necessarily wrong. But if one happens
to have a definite belief as to whether the rudiment is something new
coming in or something old going out, the language should reflect that.
'Rudimentary' and 'primitive' and 'basic' are all often ambiguous in
this sense, unlike 'vestigial' for old, and 'incipient' for new
structures.
Cliff
.
- References:
- Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- From: seeker
- Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- From: Sandy
- Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- From: cliff_lundberg@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- From: Sandy
- Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- From: uraniumcommittee
- Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- Prev by Date: Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- Next by Date: Re: KT Boundary Inquiry
- Previous by thread: Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- Next by thread: Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- Index(es):