Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- From: "Sandy" <rotsen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Apr 2006 10:42:23 -0700
Dear Cliff:
You are right. The use of "rudimentary" to describe the condition of
limbs that were in the process of being lost is clearly wrong. I
should have wriitten 'vestigial' as you point out, or perhaps, and
also incorrectly but less so, tabid.
A land lizard that loses its limbs through evolutionary processes is
not inconceivable if its prey were exclusively or mainly burrowers.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- From: uraniumcommittee
- Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- References:
- Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- From: seeker
- Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- From: Sandy
- Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- From: cliff_lundberg@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- Prev by Date: Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- Next by Date: Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- Previous by thread: Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- Next by thread: Re: Prehistoric legged snake fossil discovered,article link
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|