Re: KT Boundary Inquiry


George wrote:


So, it is not up-to-date information. It is also not an unbiased view
of
the current thinking.

Seems pretty thorough to me. Can you point out significant weak points
in his book?

The weakest link in the book is that it is ten years old.

Age in itself does not mean squat. The research done was extraordinary.

As such, there
has since been tons of data collected and interpreted, a lot of which
questions whether an impact actually caused the dinosaurs to go extinct.
The date of the Yucatan impacter has been brought into question - it may be
older than the K-T boundary event. That and the fact that the famous
irridium layer has been found right smack in the middle of the Deccan
traps, a fact which not only helps date the traps, but indicates that the
volcanism associated with them was ongoing before during and after the K-T
boundary event. In other words, a lot of data has been collected that
dispute the impact theory of the demise of the dinosaurs, and that supports
the volcanism associated with the Deccan traps and the resulting climate
change as a possible major cause. These are my major beefs with the book.
I'm sure there are others I've overlooked.

Have you read it? He talks about those issues and answers them.

The fact that the largest extinction level event in geologic history, that
of the P-T event, is not associated with an impact, but is associated with
the Siberian traps weakens the impact theory for the K-T event, and
strengthens the theory for the Deccan traps being the most likely cause of
the changes which resulted in the demise of the dinosaurs and many other
lifeforms. Stay tuned.

George

.

Quantcast