Re: Of what's become nondisclosure/taboo

Dear f/fgeorge,
Here's yet another new and improved rant;

>Why are worried about cloud scatter?
What "cloud scatter"? ~ What worried?

>You missed the part about sending up 300 quadrillion (photons) with
>each and every laser pulse.
"This can take anywhere from 2.34 to 2.71 seconds, depending on how far
away the moon is at the time (the earth-moon distance ranges from
351,000 km to 406,000 km). We can time the round trip to few-picosecond
precision, or a few trillionths of a second."
Of anything with regard to the supposed numbers of photons sent and/or
received has absolutely nothing to do with any regard to which photons
if any were derived from something that's artificial or not, whereas
the same degree of photon information as to speed and thereby distance
is exactly the same as if reflected off a 1000 m2 retroreflector or
that of 3.1416e6 m2 worth of 25+% IR reflective and apparently that
thin layer of clumping moon-dirt that looked exactly like 50/50
cornmeal and portland cement.

Therefore the answer is No, I didn't miss a damn thing. Though
apparently you're you still stuck deep within that mainstream
space-toilet?

>Don't care about the Russians, they do what they do.
That's right. Keep up with the evidence exclusions until them Apollo
cows come home. Do you go to a specialized LLPOF church or, do you just
fake that as well?

>I believe that the President thought that there were WMD's. I also
>believe that the Intelligence system was not up to snuff. Too much was
>placed on unverifiable peoples statements.
Obviously you'll believe anything your mainstream status quo has to
say, especially if it's necessary in order to protect your collective
LLPOF butts.

As per IR albedo; "Been there, done that" is yet another of your LLPOF
statements because, if you've supposedly accomplished and thus haven't
contributed any such thing; then pretell what's wrong with this
picture?

Obviously there's a wide margin of the IR spectrum to work with but,
with respect to the IR lasers as having been utilized; What is the
average IR albedo of the moon (eg at 850 nm and perhaps 1650 nm)?

Page 6 and 7 of: http://chjaa.bao.ac.cn/2004/2004_4_1p97.pdf
Reflectivity of Lunar Mare Basalt, Anorthosite and the Whole Moon at
Some Key Wave Bands (this is not quite the same as lunar albedo that
has to take into account the thick layers of carbon, iron and titanium
dust deposits that takes the albedo into the nearest space-toilet),
whereas relatively dust-free lunar anorthosite at 750 nm gets itself up
to 52% (table-3 drops this factor down to 36%), though even 850 nm at
better than 40% isn't exactly half bad reflectivity (of which the 750
nm spectrum also correlates quite nicely to the rather dark
reddish/golden-brown as recorded by Kodak moments having been imaged
from 100+km)
Whole Moon (average) at 750 nm = 27%
Whole Moon (average) at 900 nm = 25%
Therefore the lunar near-IR and 850~900 nm IR spectrums are quite
nicely reflected if the laser rangefinding were to easily target upon
such anorthosite deposits. Whereas having a retroreflector within the
traget zone or not isn't going to represent squat unless you're getting
that beam down to utilizing a 0.025 milliradian laser cannon.

BTW; Just by way of the thick, relatively H2O vapor wet and otherwise
extremely polluted and thus not so clear atmosphere is enough to cause
an optical distortion of most any beam, not to mention upon whatever's
of originating and/or retroreflector jitters, as per imposing a to/from
IR signal degrade of at the very least 20% unless you're talking about
using the Boeing/TRW ABL cannon of 100 MW and 0.5 milliradian from
40,000' off the deck. Thus a terrestrial to/from laser rangefinding
effort might be wise to appreciate a 33% signal degrade for just the
Earthly atmospheric impact, which might just as easily be compensated
by way of simply utilizing more initial energy, or somewhat less
initial divergence.

Even assuming a perfect 2 km worth of a target illuminated diameter
isn't going to be sufficient. At perhaps 200 meters diameter is where
we're starting to get real interesting.

Of course now you're having to call Kodak and of their photographic
physics nothing but liars, simply because of that form of physics truth
can't be allowed to coexist along with your grand perpetrated cold-war
and of the NASA/Apollo ruse/sting of the century.

What's the matter, haven't you killed off your fair share of Muslims or
the likes of Jesus Christ today?

GOT CROSS?

>You missed the show on Discovery last week that debunked all of those
>things! You REALLY need to get a hold of the same kind of camera the
>astronauts used, the show did, and use the same kind of film, the show
>did, and take pictures with it, again the show did.
>The pictures came out very similar to ones the astronauts took and
>even had the non parallel lines in it. I think you are using todays
>standards to try and explain how yesterdays technology was flawed. You
>are forgetting why we no longer use cameras like that, why we no
>longer do lots of things that we used to do. We have new and improved
>ways of doing and looking at and even photographing things that some
>of which were never even thought of back then.
And your bigoted out-of-context point is?

>The World is NOT one big conspiracy theory!
>It IS full of them, but not EVERYTHING is a conspiracy!

BTFW; hardly anything outside of government and external to religion is
of any conspiracy, just plain old simple greed and arrogance running
amuck without a stitch of remorse (just like yourself). Real honest to
'God fearing' and generally hard working folks simply don't have the
time nor take all that much pleasure as they relish within the notions
of perpetrating conspiracies at the demise of humanity, though
obviously you do.

You just keep disregarding Kodak physics and manage to do so without
remorse, just as you intend to keep killing off humanity, allowing
30,000+ innocent humans (mostly children) as to needlessly die each and
every day while hundreds of millions of others (at least 10% of Earth's
population) somehow manage to live their short and miserable lives
within sub-human conditions. This mindset of your's will certainly go
right along with your actions of global pollution and subsequent
global-warming agenda plus anti-ET and thus anti-God paganism of yours
that sucks and blows.
~

Life on Venus, a Township, Bridge and ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
"In war there are no rules" - Brad Guth

.

Loading