Re: Life on the moon

Chris,
Not that sequestered forms of life couldn't have managed to have
survived within our moon, although since the more viable alternative of
Venus hosting significant other life remains as still so entirely
nondisclosure/taboo within the mindset of most individuals that can't
think outside of their mainstream box, in that case here's a little
more nifty tit-for-tat gibberish/word-salad/word-games worth of info
about icy proto-moons, as for their once upon a time hosting a rather
nice verity of DNA/RNA seeds of life as I believe having been
intelligently designed on our behalf. How otherwise would ETs have
managed such interstellar transports of sufficient ice and life within
for the task of terraforming other worlds?

For something of such slight gravity of attraction, it seems that our
moon has clearly been hosting an assortment of somewhat unusually large
craters, many of which measure greater than 1000 km, with one extremely
massive 2100 km to the outer most secondary rim and by some 12+km depth
of an impression as situated near the South Pole Aitken Basin that's
primarily on the farside of the moon, is actually offering an extremely
shallow impact zone ratio of 175:1. It's almost as though two icy orbs
had merged in such a velocity that their mutual coverings of ice had
managed to take up the vast amounts of kinetic energy before either
bedrock could have been involved. That analogy goes for a fair number
of other large craters having established relatively slight depressions
as per their crater diameter. Though many other significant craters are
of 200 km, yet even of many craters of under 100 km diameter are
frequently quite shallow by comparison to the more recent and thereby
usually of smaller diameter craters, whereas many of these are of a 6:1
diameter/depth ratio and some of the most recent remain about as deep
as they are wide.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_craters_on_the_Moon,_L-N
Crater Newton is only 8.85 km deep but otherwise 78 km in diameter,
roughly 8.8:1 is certainly a moderately shallow crater of what a low
density (icy comet) impact would have represented. However, many of the
smaller Moltke like craters of roughly 5:1 seem to suggest less if any
involvement of ice, while the likes of little Osiris at 1 km is
supposedly 1.2 km deep was most likely of a primarily solid iron if not
involving a bit greater density, having most certainly impacted at a
time when our moon offered little if any protective covering of ice.

If an icy proto-moon were to be impacted by yet another icy proto-moon
or other such orb as Sedna offering perhaps 1800 km worth of an icy
diameter, chances are the bedrock core of our once icy moon would have
been given one nasty smooch worth of a somewhat shallow dimension
though otherwise of a fairly large diameter lasting impression. Of
course, the same might be said of the notion as to such an icy
proto-moon of 4000 km bouncing itself off of an atmospherically
surrounded planet as Earth as having perhaps 10 bar to work with, and
thus just as easily having created the largest of impressions upon the
moon that should have deposited a few teratonnes of DNA/RNA infected
proto-moon ice in the process:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap960906.html
Using a graphics or CAD program, draw out the moon as having a 262 km
covering of ice, then Sedna with perhaps 180 km if not 270 km worth of
ice, then Earth with a possible 10 bar worth of it's early atmospheric
cushion as reaching out to perhaps 200 km and, then merge these items
into touching one another, as in hard surface to hard surface at
perhaps the 12 km depth, taking a look-see at what the merging layers
of ice or that of ice and atmosphere would have produced in the way of
a lunar crater.

http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/permanent/meteorites/impacts/moon.php
"When an object the size of a sand grain or even smaller hurtles
through space and into Earth's atmosphere, friction heats it to more
than 1,650°C (3,000°F) and it vaporizes in a flash of light. But the
Moon has essentially no atmosphere to protect it from incoming objects.
So even a microscopic speck of dust, or micrometeoroid, and forms a
tiny crater."

"The Moon's surface is covered with microcraters smaller than a human
red blood cell. The steady pelting of the Moon helps pulverize the
fine-grained layer of powder that covers the Moon's surface. This
"tilling" of the lunar soil proceeds so slowly that the footprints of
the Apollo astronauts will last for at least a million years."

This "moon.php" file should also have at least suggested as to what has
been capable of being collected upon our moon as compared to what
otherwise having been atmospherically diverted or otherwise prevented
from becoming collected upon Earth. Thus my conservative SWAG of 0.1
mm/year should not be so easily contested since we still have nothing
sharing interactive scientific data from the surface of our moon, only
terrestrial and satellite radar data concluding the meters deep
moon-dust is in fact the case.

BTW; the moon obviously offers a good amount of sufficiently vertical
grades of exposed bedrock, or at least as having been vertically impact
formed and/or via displaced basalt, as per such hard and steep incline
surfaces accommodating much less than meters thick dust to contend
with. At least I can see those sorts of extensively rock like lunar
surfaces from my backyard, and better as seen from those absolutely
terrific Apollo orbit obtained images.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/

BTW No.2; there's been no technically qualified reason(s) as to why the
relatively small and thus minimal drag coefficient SMART-1 mission
(roughly a tenth that of the Apollo craft) can't obtain and sustain
itself within an elliptical semi/polar orbit of reaching down to less
than 50 km, that is unless the mostly argon atmosphere of the moon is
considerably more extensive than we've been mislead into believing,
that plus considering the length of mission having to take into account
the physics matter of secondary/recoil radiation exceeding the safety
limits of the PV cells and of other internal scientific components.

http://library.thinkquest.org/CR0215468/our_moon.htm
Big Red: "During a lunar eclipse the moon grows dim and has a dark
orangey red color. This is known as ''The Big Red." This happens
because the Sun's light passes through the Earth's atmosphere, which
bends the light separating it into all the colors of the rainbow. Red
is the only color to reach the moon. The red light bounces off the
moon, making the moon appear red."
That plus the matter of hard-science and Kodak physics fact that the
natural color of the dark lunar surface is actually a rather deep
golden reddish brown of a composite color that's nearly coal dark in
places due to the raw deposits of solar carbon, iron and titanium as
having blended in with the naturally dark (nearly coal like) nature of
lunar basalt.

Apparently public schools and most other forms of our supposedly high
standards and accountability types of NASA certified education are not
allowed to review upon those Kodak and other qualified color images of
our moon as even having been accomplished by our Apollo orbits of the
moon, especially of those having something of artificial nature and/or
of mother Earth within the same frame:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/
~

Life on Venus, a Township, Bridge and ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
"In war there are no rules" - Brad Guth

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: On the Subject of Ice
    ... The quoted passage below, from a NASA website, explains how ice exists ... "The Moon has no atmosphere, any substance on the lunar surface is ... shadowed areas do exist in the bottom of deep craters near the Moon's ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Re: So how can we afford that ?
    ... method of "so what's the difference" worth of artificial inflation via ... Since most anything about our moon and especially if pertaining Venus, ... Megatonnes of moon rock resides upon Earth; ... Of course there's been absolute loads of smaller than 100 km craters ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Life on the moon
    ... craters on the moon where ice is also found. ... This type of carbon growth may also occur on northern and craters on the ... These carbon growths are universal and occour everywhere there is an energy ...
    (sci.astro.seti)
  • Re: Next Space Station: 7.35e22 kg at Earths L1
    ... Without our moon, over sufficient time Earth would soon enough become ... pesky moon until after the very last ice age this planet w/moon will ... moon craters with any open mindset, whereas most of which are truly ...
    (sci.space.station)
  • Re: the moon surface is soft
    ... available remote science of our moon is more than good enough to ... Much of our salty old moon's surface has in fact become soft. ... moon craters with any open mindset, whereas most of which are truly ... potential of ice as having once upon a time covered that big old salty ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading