Re: Of what's become nondisclosure/taboo
- From: "Brad Guth" <ieisbradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2005 20:00:26 -0700
f/fgeorge;
>I can't see any reason to the idea that our little
>section is all there is.
>Just because we can't see past the edge doesn't mean that waaaaay out
>there there isn't anything.
Your ulterior motive as another or secondary ruse is working. It's
making you almost human.
I'd have to agree that perhaps a few little bangs transpired, or
perhaps like that black hole sort of passage that sucks in more ways
than we can understand. Also, from time to time the Oort to Oort zone
encounters with the likes of the Sirius star system should have been
interesting.
What if that once upon a time black hole encounter were merely an
amount or seed of antimatter as having been nicely surrounded by those
nearly resting photons?
Thereby not all that much normal gravity to deal with, just lots of
potential antimatter mass that need not be very large and, thereby a
great deal of empty space within a given black hole, plus horrific
energy differentials to boot that should make something happen to
whatever's capable of passing through.
I'm talking about that seed of antimatter accommodating a nifty cloak
of those photons from 1e-10 nm (roughly the size of an atom) to perhaps
at least 3e5 km if not 9.46e12 km, thus quite a wide spectrum worth of
perhaps as many as 1e100 photons/atom.
If the antimatter core represented 1e30 atoms, than the collective of
those nearly resting photons might become as great as 1e130. Of course
such nearly resting photons would remain somewhat energy dark to our
instruments, especially of that many as having been situated in one
tight little black hole of a spot.
BTW "f/fgeorge"; why are you bothering to having this perfectly honest
to God contribution of yours removed in 6 Days?
>I have some ideas on this: What if there was no "big bang" that
>engulfed EVERYTHING. What if it was a "big bang" just in our section
>of the sky? In order for there to be a "big bang" there HAD to be
>something to go BANG! NO ONE has EVER been able to even SHOW how to
>produce something from nothing. Since it is not concievable it
>probably couldn't have happened! Since that is true then there HAD to
>be something BEFORE the "big bang"!
>Soooo on to the idea, suppose OUR section of the Universe went thru a
>black hole type event and after the compression and "big bang" it
>regrouped and made what we now recognize as our section of the whole.
>Just because we can't see past the edge doesn't mean that waaaaay out
>there there isn't anything. There is lots of "empty" space between our
>known Galaxys and I can't see any reason to the idea that our little
>section is all there is.
~
Life on Venus, Township w/Bridge and ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
"In war there are no rules" - Brad Guth
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Of what's become nondisclosure/taboo
- Next by Date: Re: Of what's become nondisclosure/taboo
- Previous by thread: Re: Of what's become nondisclosure/taboo
- Next by thread: Boinc S@H Up, Sort of
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
