Re: OT: r - I thought you should see this
- From: Charlie Self <charliediy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:40:41 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 29, 2:38 pm, Tim Daneliuk <tun...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mark & Juanita wrote:
nailshoote...@xxxxxxx wrote:
You guys take this election much to seriously.
Where the presidential election stands now, I would tend to agree.
The key is going to be the House and Senate. A socialist-leaning
statist in the White House coupled with a legislature controlled by
similar leaning
Say, like George W. Bush, who's spent more on social entitlements both
in real dollars and per capita than *any* other president? For the
record, I supported W on pounding Iraq (and still do - it was the
staying there that irritates me), but this guy's fiscal
irresponsibility is at the same level as people like Kennedy and his
horrid Leftie cronies.
Sorry. GWB's spending is at a level that no one else has ever come
close to reaching. He not only spent his political capital, he's spent
the country's fiscal capital for years to come. How are your great-
great grandkids doing? Well, I hope, as they're the ones who will be
paying off his wonderful MBA touch.
.
- References:
- OT: r - I thought you should see this
- From: nailshooter41@xxxxxxx
- Re: OT: r - I thought you should see this
- From: nailshooter41@xxxxxxx
- Re: OT: r - I thought you should see this
- From: Jeff
- Re: OT: r - I thought you should see this
- From: LRod
- Re: OT: r - I thought you should see this
- From: nailshooter41@xxxxxxx
- Re: OT: r - I thought you should see this
- From: Mark & Juanita
- Re: OT: r - I thought you should see this
- From: Tim Daneliuk
- OT: r - I thought you should see this
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about the Rockler Tenoning Jig
- Next by Date: Re: OT: r - I thought you should see this
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: r - I thought you should see this
- Next by thread: Re: OT: r - I thought you should see this
- Index(es):