Re: OT: Apple, tree..not falling far from...etc

Fred the Red Shirt wrote:
On Feb 19, 3:23 pm, DS <ds1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fred the Red Shirt wrote:



On Feb 19, 2:06 pm, DS <ds1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Robatoy wrote:
On Feb 19, 11:51 am, DS <ds1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
us."
The defense contractors, KBR, and many more 'big guns' have done
extremely well because of that war. Then again, you could be one of
those who doesn't believe The Carlyle Group exists or that they have
any influence in foreign policy. (Look at their BOD)
It has NEVER been different... follow the money. Who benefits?
The 5th birth day pony arguments, etc,....you are right, those do not
hold water.
Another possibility is pressure from a religious lobby, to bring on
the New World Order that Bush 41 talked about.
What the hell do I know... but don't limit W's motives to simple
thoughts.
So he and Dick Cheney decided that killing millions would be a cool way
to make some extra cash?
Jebus made him do it?
He wouldn't be the first. The Saudis certainly made a lot
of money from the invasion.
Unfortunately, both sides of this debate over simplify what little
factual information we're allowed to see, then villify and ridicule the
other viewpoints until we're left with very little real information on
which to base our opinions.
One side lied. The other sides may speculate as to why,
but that doesn't change the facts.
You think only the people on one side of this issue are lying? I doubt
that.

Your doubts are well-founded. I don't think that. But clearly
one lying side had the power and made the decisions.

However, the point that Iraqi chemical weapons were short-lived
has never been disputed by any parties to the controversy.
The Bush administration never even tried to rebut that, they
jsut ignored the argument.

Seriously. Really. You realize I'm talking politics here right?
And I wish we knew what the facts really are. Point is, we don't.

Have you any doubt at all that the yellowcake documents submitted
to the IAEA were forgeries?

Like the rest of this debacle, we're relying on the information we're being fed.
The yellowcake uranium info was just one piece of many.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Apple, tree..not falling far from...etc
    ... factual information we're allowed to see, ... You think only the people on one side of this issue are lying? ... The Bush administration never even tried to rebut that, ... And I wish we knew what the facts really are. ...
    (rec.woodworking)
  • Re: Where are the facts of Pauls alleged duplicity?
    ... MIA1:  I think you've forgotten who the bully is here, and in terms of lying ... Wahid lying about Kholi and Maneck: ... facts he finds just don't fit well; I suspect that they are just other ...
    (talk.religion.bahai)
  • Re: can you post anything Mr. Christensen?
    ... Since then he has been pissed as hell as it undermined his lying ... Dan believes that he can win with "propaganda" ... He is the type of guy that will continue to lie in the face of irrefutable facts. ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)