Re: Some Thought On Intelligent Design - WAS: OT Is George Bush Drinking?




Fletis Humplebacker wrote:
> "Bruce Barnett"
>...
>
>
> > There is a big HUGE difference between ID and evolution.
> > But you ignored my earlier point.
>
> > There is NO way to use ID to predict any results.

I don't think that's true. For example, presuming an omnipetant
intelligent designer one hypothesis might be that there would be
no evolutionary 'dead ends'.

> > We CAN use evolution to predict results.
>
>
> You can't predict anything with evolution.

False. Hypothesis testing of competing theories of evolution
is why some come to be favored over others.

An hypothesis entails a prediction. But recall what Niehls Bohr
said about prediction, that it is very difficult, especially
about the future. A prediction, in the sense of an hypothesis
may be made about past events, evidence of which has not yet
been discovered, (e.g. predictions of what may be found in
the fossil record), or current phenomena not yet observed,
which has been happening a lot over the past several decades
in DNA studies.

>
> If evolution was tested and proven in some concrete way it wouldn't
> be a hypothesis.

Evolution is not an hypothesis. Evolution is a field of study
within biology. Over the centuries there have been several theories
within that field, those theories spawn hypotheses which can be tested.

> ... That's
> why it's important to give school children an unbiased education.

They should be given a better education about the process of
science.

--

FF

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Can there be a mathematical proof of evolution?
    ... Since you haven't provided one for evolution. ... Darwin predicted that Precambrian fossils would be found. ... and the prediction turned out to be correct. ... In "The Origin Of Species", ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Can there be a mathematical proof of evolution?
    ... from the Theory of Evolution: ... Darwin predicted that Precambrian fossils would be found. ... and the prediction turned out to be correct. ... In "The Origin Of Species", ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The uncorrected simplifications/oversimplifications of
    ... >>> direction of selection. ... > to write a mathematically-true statement about the action of selection ... > evolution, so that we may treat HR as if it is a complete description ... >>> selection will favour them to obey the prediction. ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Can there be a mathematical proof of evolution?
    ... Darwin predicted that Precambrian fossils would be found. ... Evolution predicts that we will find fossil series. ... and the prediction turned out to be correct. ... In "The Origin Of Species", ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Re: Can there be a mathematical proof of evolution?
    ... from the Theory of Evolution: ... Darwin predicted that Precambrian fossils would be found. ... and the prediction turned out to be correct. ... In "The Origin Of Species", ...
    (talk.origins)

Quantcast