Re: analog equipment and the FCC
- From: "David McCall" <mccallmail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:29:37 GMT
"David McCall" <mccallmail@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Zm1ek.49$kf4.22@xxxxxxxxxxx
Oops, het the send too soon.
"Smarty" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OIXdk.50$av4.31@xxxxxxxxxxx
<phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote in messageI heard that too.
news:g59fnq0jlt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:30:49 -0400 Rick Merrill
<rick0.merrill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| Recent FCC regulations will make analog over cable (that's right, over
| cable) obsolete by Feb 2012.
Technology did that back in the early 1990's. The FCC is just now
catching up.
--
|WARNING: Due to extreme spam, googlegroups.com is blocked. Due to
ignorance |
| by the abuse department, bellsouth.net is blocked. If you
post to |
| Usenet from these places, find another Usenet provider ASAP. |
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (email for humans: first name in lower case at
ipal.net) |
Phil,
I don't understand your point. My local Time Warner cable company
delivers nearly 70 analog TV channels to this day in analog format. Are
you referring to some cable companies which are purely digital?
73's
Smarty
It came as a suprise because I wouldn't have thought that the FCC had
much control of the signals transmitted over a privately owned wire or
fiber.
Not a big surprise though. The cable industry has wanted to get rid of
analog
for several years. I guess their lobbiest are doing their job.
David
.
- References:
- analog equipment and the FCC
- From: Rick Merrill
- Re: analog equipment and the FCC
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: analog equipment and the FCC
- From: Smarty
- Re: analog equipment and the FCC
- From: David McCall
- analog equipment and the FCC
- Prev by Date: Re: analog equipment and the FCC
- Next by Date: Re: newbie question - rotate WMV
- Previous by thread: Re: analog equipment and the FCC
- Next by thread: Re: analog equipment and the FCC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|