Re: Canopus ADVC300 Issue/Question (too long answer :-)
- From: Gene E. Bloch <spamfree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:47:00 -0700
On 4/28/2006, Martin Heffels posted this:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:37:36 GMT, "David McCall" <david.mccall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Well sort-of. If you are talking about those new fangled video cameras
with their CCDs, then yes.
Not sort of... With PAL interlaced video, the CCD/CMOS is refreshed every
1/50th of a second. Film when shooting for cinema, is only exposed for
1/48th of a second when you use the standard 180 degree shutter. So the
difference in exposure-time between these two is negligible, and makes no
difference in motion-blur. NTSC will have a little less blur in this
instance, but to compensate the actors should move faster, and the pans
need to be done faster ;-)
cheers
-martin-
For a second or two, I misread your last sentence in the above clip as:
"and the puns need to be done faster".
I think I'm going to run with that :-)
Gino
--
Gene E. Bloch (Gino)
letters617blochg3251
(replace the numbers by "at" and "dotcom")
.
- References:
- Canopus ADVC300 Issue/Question
- From: Nate
- Re: Canopus ADVC300 Issue/Question (too long answer :-)
- From: David McCall
- Re: Canopus ADVC300 Issue/Question (too long answer :-)
- From: Martin Heffels
- Re: Canopus ADVC300 Issue/Question (too long answer :-)
- From: David McCall
- Re: Canopus ADVC300 Issue/Question (too long answer :-)
- From: Martin Heffels
- Canopus ADVC300 Issue/Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Can one "overclock" a CRT monitor's video input bandwidth? Need slightly higher refresh rate than my existng CRT allows...
- Next by Date: Re: CCD scanning/exposure (was Re: Canopus ADVC300 ... )
- Previous by thread: Re: Canopus ADVC300 Issue/Question (too long answer :-)
- Next by thread: Re: CCD scanning/exposure (was Re: Canopus ADVC300 ... )
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|