Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- From: "J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:37:48 -0500
Lee Philips wrote:
"Grinder" <grinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8W%Mf.794015$x96.744559@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Lee Philips wrote:
"Steve King" <steveSPAMBLOCK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:aZ-dnRWegcmX7ZnZRVn-jQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What's the scoop these days re: compatibility? I've been doing -R
since
that's what my original burners required. Occasionally, I have some
compatibility problems with client machines.
This is oversimplfied, but generally more DVD drives older
than 3-4 years will be compatible with -R, while more newer
drives either use +R or can handle either format.
I can see the advantage to -R is that it would be compatible with both
of these generalized groups.
For distribution to large companies or other groups, -R is still
the way to go. But if a client has mostly new computer
hardware then choose +R.
What is the advantage in using +R in this case?
It'll cover newer drives that are +R only, as well as drives
that handle both formats.
There are very, very few drives that are "+R only" for _reading_, just for
writing.
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
.
- References:
- DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- From: Steve King
- Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- From: Lee Philips
- Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- From: Grinder
- Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- From: Lee Philips
- DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- Prev by Date: Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- Next by Date: Re: Digital camcorder/camera combo?
- Previous by thread: Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- Next by thread: Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|