Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- From: Grinder <grinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:40:20 GMT
Lee Philips wrote:
"Steve King" <steveSPAMBLOCK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:aZ-dnRWegcmX7ZnZRVn-jQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What's the scoop these days re: compatibility? I've been doing -R since
that's what my original burners required. Occasionally, I have some
compatibility problems with client machines.
This is oversimplfied, but generally more DVD drives older
than 3-4 years will be compatible with -R, while more newer
drives either use +R or can handle either format.
I can see the advantage to -R is that it would be compatible with both of these generalized groups.
For distribution to large companies or other groups, -R is still
the way to go. But if a client has mostly new computer
hardware then choose +R.
What is the advantage in using +R in this case?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- From: Lee Philips
- Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- References:
- DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- From: Steve King
- Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- From: Lee Philips
- DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- Prev by Date: Re: reliable set-top DVD recorder?
- Next by Date: Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- Previous by thread: Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- Next by thread: Re: DVD +R Vs. DVD-R
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|