Re: smoking in Europe
- From: doofy <nope@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 06:21:09 -0700
allan wrote:
poldy wrote:
In article <of2d53p2ij32tbsocbiun2hvce06dpa4qs@xxxxxxx>,
The Reid <dontuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
a very small bit probably wont, a bit of live and let live is a good
thing.
Even if you can't get cancer from second-hand smoke, it's still an
irritant to many people.
No reason people should have to put up with it.
Along with perfume, cars, mobile phones etc.
No reason why people should have to put up with them.
Let's be consistent and ban everything that's an irritant to many
people.
There won't be much left.
Allan
Since perfume companies have started making their product with 5-6000 petrochemicals, some carcinogenic, some neurotoxins, some known to cause allergic reactions, yes, they should be outlawed. But that industry is essentially unregulated due to "trade secret" laws.
.
- References:
- Re: smoking in Europe
- From: poldy
- Re: smoking in Europe
- From: allan
- Re: smoking in Europe
- Prev by Date: Re: Food in Greece
- Next by Date: Re: smoking in Europe
- Previous by thread: Re: smoking in Europe
- Next by thread: Re: smoking in Europe
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|