Re: smoking in Europe


poldy wrote:

In article <of2d53p2ij32tbsocbiun2hvce06dpa4qs@xxxxxxx>,
The Reid <dontuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

a very small bit probably wont, a bit of live and let live is a good
thing.

Even if you can't get cancer from second-hand smoke, it's still an
irritant to many people.

No reason people should have to put up with it.

Along with perfume, cars, mobile phones etc.

No reason why people should have to put up with them.

Let's be consistent and ban everything that's an irritant to many
people.
There won't be much left.

Allan

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: smoking in Europe
    ... Even if you can't get cancer from second-hand smoke, ... irritant to many people. ... No reason people should have to put up with it. ...
    (rec.travel.europe)
  • Re: smoking in Europe
    ... Even if you can't get cancer from second-hand smoke, ... irritant to many people. ... No reason people should have to put up with it. ...
    (rec.travel.europe)
  • Re: smoking in Europe
    ... Even if you can't get cancer from second-hand smoke, ... irritant to many people. ... No reason people should have to put up with it. ...
    (rec.travel.europe)
  • Re: smoking in Europe
    ... Even if you can't get cancer from second-hand smoke, ... irritant to many people. ... No reason people should have to put up with it. ...
    (rec.travel.europe)
  • Re: smoking in Europe
    ... Even if you can't get cancer from second-hand smoke, ... irritant to many people. ... No reason people should have to put up with it. ... It's a triple post now. ...
    (rec.travel.europe)