Re: Looking for Daniel R. Bonham
- From: Charles <fort@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:15:47 -0500
In article <474d67b5$0$5296$9a566e8b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike
<mike@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Look, I don't agree with what this guy did (sounds like a lawsuit in the
making)
And do you know if this "private e-mail" is for real? Sisker could have
made it up. I would not take Sisker's word for it.
Or someone else could have made it up and forged Bonham's name on it
and sent it to Sisker. We know there are troublemakers who do that.
And since Sisker can't trace the e-mail because it came with a phony
e-mail address, then isn't going to be able to prove that it came from
Bonham, even if Bonham actually did send it.
I have had my disagreements with Bonham, but if I knew Bonham's e-mail
address, which I don't, I sure would not snitch it out to Sisker, so he
can harass Bonham. Sisker destroyed his own reputation with his own
words and actions, he needs no help from Bonham in that regard.
--
Charles
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Looking for Daniel R. Bonham
- From: Chrissy Cruiser
- Re: Looking for Daniel R. Bonham
- From: John Sisker
- Re: Looking for Daniel R. Bonham
- References:
- Looking for Daniel R. Bonham
- From: John Sisker
- Re: Looking for Daniel R. Bonham
- From: Mike
- Looking for Daniel R. Bonham
- Prev by Date: Re: The Best Port Lecturer
- Next by Date: nuttin
- Previous by thread: Re: Looking for Daniel R. Bonham
- Next by thread: Re: Looking for Daniel R. Bonham
- Index(es):