Re: Looking for Daniel R. Bonham

First of all, let's address my use of the word "flowerily", which is indeed
not the correct word in this situation, but "flowery" is. Sorry about this
misuse, but since this is really a moot point anyway, let's move on.

As to the comment by another, that this situation does sound like a lawsuit
in the making; yes, that's the reason for this original post.

And yes, I also said that no-doubt there will be some who think I am getting
what I deserve anyway. Obviously, there was no hesitation with them telling
us all why. Yet, all this off-target dialogue has been brought up before;
signature lines are indeed acceptable by Charter rules, and are not
considered advertising per se. The interpretation, and apparent
double-standard, is with those who feel Goldenberg's and Leppla's signature
lines are perfectly acceptable, while mine is obviously spamming and
advertising. Yet, I simply followed the same exact format of Ray's, so there
would be no problem. Go figure!

Likewise, don't give me credit for what one called the ruining of this
newsgroup; for changes have apparently been taking place long before I even
surfaced. I'm obviously just an convenient excuse for what's really going
on. Besides, I don't think it's ruined at all, just restructured with more
relevant information; while the social butterflies realize that this was not
their own private social clique.

And just for your information, sometime ago I did drop my signature line
altogether. This was also at the encouragement of others on this newsgroup,
and to hopefully start a precedence for others to follow as well. The bottom
line is, it didn't work, with both Goldenberg and Leppla being the biggest
hold-outs. And just as bad, the personal insults, name calling, sarcasm,
innuendos and speculations did not even slow down one bit. So, there was
obviously no point in me continuing with that exercise in futility.

In addition, I also agree that personal responses should really be through a
private e-mail, but they seldom are. I think the reason should be quite
obvious. Some simply like to stir the pot and seemingly show the newsgroup
that they are still around.

As to the related value of press releases, who actually determines that? The
bottom line is, if a press release is of no interest to you, then don't read
it. While some information may be of no interest to one, it may indeed be to
another. Therefore, none of us should be screening out what others have
access to, based only on our personal preferences.

And now we have Leppla, who mysteriously always seems to surface in things
like this, much as a moth would be to a flame. Yet, nothing new is ever
said, just the same old vengeance spread around where he feels appropriate.
As to Leppla's snide comment about veiled threats, it's actually funny for
him to be so quick to judge. What does he think this original post is all
about? And, of course, there is always the Joystar matter, which is still
being investigated. Naturally, one had to chose their battle wisely, and to
also make sure there is really something there - plus the timing has to be
right as well.

This obviously won't be the last word in this type of post, when others also
see the opportunity to get in on the bashing. But, as I said before, that's
certainly expected with some. Yet, since I have broad shoulders, it's best
for me at this time to actually stick to the intent of this original post,
for that is where priorities now need to be. I am however making some
progress, I now know what state Bonham lives in.

Happy sailing,
John Sisker, SHIP-TO-SHORE CRUISE AGENCY®
(714) 536-3850 or toll free at (800) 724-6644 & (Agency No. 714.536.3850)
www.shiptoshorecruise.com




.

Quantcast