Re: QM2 Repercussions

"Charles" <fort@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:300120062024083956%fort@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> As a consumer and not a stockholder, and not a TA, I think it is very
> good that Cunard gave in. And in reality they missed four ports as they
> were a day late to Rio. The whole charector and quality of the booked
> cruise was changed. The cruise that occured was not the cruise that was
> booked.

You know that now that a precedent has been set that any future cruise that
misses a port will become the target of a passenger revolt.

Please enlighten me on how this is going to be considered "good".
--
DG in Cherry Hill, NJ

(* _ *)


.

Quantcast