Re: Well, Markku, are you too embarrassed....
- From: Steve Kramer <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:05:39 +0700
Alfred Molon wrote:
In article <fe9fo6$rpm$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steve Kramer says...Runge4 wrote:Pfff write him in private, it's a bore to read that guyTried that. His e-mail is a fake. Just like most trolls.
He is not a troll. See here for a definition of troll:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29
Thank you, Alfred. That was very necessary.... Who gives a damn about the specific title of his type of abuse. Try sticking to the substance of the comment instead of playing with semantics. While it might require more thinking, it really does carry more importance. If you aren't capable of that, why not just ignore the thread?
Steve Kramer
"PhotoEnvisions" Photography
Chiang Mai, Thailand
http://www.photoenvisions.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Well, Markku, are you too embarrassed....
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: Well, Markku, are you too embarrassed....
- References:
- Well, Markku, are you too embarrassed....
- From: Steve Kramer
- Re: Well, Markku, are you too embarrassed....
- From: Runge4
- Re: Well, Markku, are you too embarrassed....
- From: Steve Kramer
- Re: Well, Markku, are you too embarrassed....
- From: Alfred Molon
- Well, Markku, are you too embarrassed....
- Prev by Date: Re: Bridge between Java and Sumatra
- Next by Date: Re: Ping: Markku.....
- Previous by thread: Re: Well, Markku, are you too embarrassed....
- Next by thread: Re: Well, Markku, are you too embarrassed....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|