Re: US customs poor service
- From: john_kulp@xxxxxxxxxxx (John Kulp)
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:38:00 GMT
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 22:54:12 +1000, "ant"
<claimsagent_directives@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JA_MORAN wrote:
I am a systems engineer and design things so there is not a single
point of failure, there are multiple network connections, multiple
switches
or routers, and also multiple servers in a cluster or load balanced
arangement.
I have noted, with some astonishment, that Americans generally are quite
poor at risk assessment and risk-mitigation. They are quite likely to allow
a system that can collapse with quite minor failures, and have no useful
contingency plans in place either.
If a catastrophe does happen, they all get very active, but actual results
are slow to emerge.
When I first noticed this, I was surprised but didn't quite believe it. But
repeated observations of the same thing confirmed this conclusion. I bet
I'm not the only one to have noted this.
I'm sure this moronic, simplistic generalization is based on just tons
of credible research, so post it for us.
.
- References:
- US customs poor service
- From: JA_MORAN
- Re: US customs poor service
- From: ant
- US customs poor service
- Prev by Date: Re: time zones for departure / arrival times
- Next by Date: Re: US customs poor service
- Previous by thread: Re: US customs poor service
- Next by thread: Re: US customs poor service
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|