Re: Should Some 737s Be Permanently/Temporarily Parked ?
- From: shmat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (VS)
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
In article <JNydnS8lpJumTsPeRVn-jQ@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Charles Newman <charlesnewman1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The 737 is also capable or rocketing up to cruiing
>altitude at 5000 feet per minute, of the aircraft is
>flying fast enough.
You forgot to add that this is an ``imaginary'' 737
in a computer game that you seem to be playing all
day long.
>I find in Flight Simulator that
>if I accelerate to 600 knots plus airspeed right
>after takeoff, I can take a 737 up to cruising
>altitutide at a rate of 5000 feet per minute.
Uh-huh. If you stick your left hand in your pants, you go
supersonic, right?
In the real world, Vy for B737-200 is 270 knots or
thereabouts, and even then the rate of climb is well
below 5000 fpm. You should ask for a refund on your game.
.
- References:
- Should Some 737s Be Permanently/Temporarily Parked ?
- From: Robert Cohen
- Re: Should Some 737s Be Permanently/Temporarily Parked ?
- From: PTravel
- Re: Should Some 737s Be Permanently/Temporarily Parked ?
- From: Charles Newman
- Should Some 737s Be Permanently/Temporarily Parked ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Should Some 737s Be Permanently/Temporarily Parked ?
- Next by Date: Re: Should Some 737s Be Permanently/Temporarily Parked ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Should Some 737s Be Permanently/Temporarily Parked ?
- Next by thread: Re: Should Some 737s Be Permanently/Temporarily Parked ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|