Re: use only return part of ticket


Reef Fish wrote:
> Tchiowa wrote:
> > Reef Fish wrote:
> > > Reef Fish wrote:
> > > > Oh no! Not Tchiowa again!
> > > >
> > > > Tchiowa is deficient in his comprehension of the English language
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Not a hallucination. It's the law in Australia. If you had ever
> > > > > actually been there you might understand that.
> > > >
> > > > Tchiowa, your ENGLISH failed you, again.
> > > >
> > > > I said, "What about that 70 lb LEGAL issue you said I brought up ..."
> > > >
> > > > So, my reference to "your hullucination" was in your FALSE
> > > > allegation that I brought up the LEGALITY issue. NOT whether
> > > > the 70 limit is law or not in Australia.
> >
> > I never claimed that *you* brought up the legality issue. You brought
> > up the weight issue. I pointed out to you the legality issue which is
> > something you clearly didn't know about.
>
> Tchiowa, you're beating a dead horse now. YOU brought out the red-
> herring NON-issue of the LEGALITY of bags over 70 lbs in AUS, with
> which I discussed with no one, and then claimed I brought out that
> issue.

Out and out lie. I never claimed you brought up the legality. I brought
up the legality. You brought up the 70 lb bags.

> > > It took several rounds of this kind of nonsense by Tchiowa before
> > > I deduced that he couldn't understand plain, simple English
> > > that I finally came to this suspicion:
> > >
> > > > Tchiowa, I had thought you were Australian. Now your repeated
> > > > inability to comprehend ENGLISH gives me the suspicion that you
> > > > are an Asian, who never learned how to read ENGLISH properly.
> >
> > No. I'm American. And your inability to write English tells me that you
> > are a semi-educated Tennessee hillbilly.
>
> A native American or a naturalized American from Thailand?

Born and raised American.

> In any
> event, if you learned your English in Thailand, it showed. If you
> learned your English in the USA, it showed also, as your English
> comprehension couldn't be higher than the 8th grade level.

Why don't you respond to the question about what *you* wrote? Your
statements were quite clear. You are the one who wrote them and you
didn't even understand what you wrote. The statements are below. Why
are you ignoring them?

> > I love it. You point out that I travel a lot. That's right, I do.
>
> Really? You travel a lot just to be in 6,120 threads in
> soc.culture.thai?

Yes, I've been going to Thailand regularly for nearly 2 decades. I have
a second home there now. You never seem to leave your mother's
apartment in Tennessee.

> Your appearance in 95 threads, not knowing how to follow any of them,
> was unquestionably a combination of your DEFICIENCY in English and
> your DEFICIENCY in air travel experience.

You can keep saying those idiotics things all you'd like. Your
statements have been reposted repeatedly and they repeatedly prove you
wrong.

> Travelling by riding richshaws or buffalos in Bangkok is not exactly
> valuable information in rec.travel.AIR. LOL.
>
>
> As I said, go back to your soc.culture.thai. Probably influenced
> by the Holy Cows of India, that group is much more tolerant to YOUR
> Bull ***. :-)))

Interesting that the self-proclaimed "seasoned traveller" has such a
demeaning attitude toward other cultures.

You remind me of the Foxworthy joke about knowing that you're a
Tennessee redneck because your family tree doesn't fork.

When are you going to travel, Mr. Seasoned Traveller?

.