Re: Libero setting from front zone "extension"
- From: Todd Haverkos <tdh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Aug 2007 09:48:14 -0500
Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> writes:
On 2007-08-17, Todd Haverkos <tdh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+---------------------+
| |
| |
| +---------+ |
| | Court | |
| | | |
| +---------+ |
| | | |
- - + - - +---------+ - - + - -
C | B | A | B | C
- - + - - +---------+ - - + - -
| | | |
| | | |
| +---------+ |
| |
| Free zone |
+---------------------+
Shouldn't B and C extend all the way up? I would expect a libero setting
from the other side of the center line to still restrict a hitter to
contacting the ball below the top of the net.
Bruno,
Holger's question also covered aspects of the definition of the front
zone and its extension and his diagram was created mostly for that.
But your understanding of the attack restrictions on a ball handset by
the libero is correct. If pursuit were allowed on this court of
course.
Best Regards,
--
Todd Haverkos tdh@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.vbref.org/
.
- References:
- Libero setting from front zone "extension"
- From: Holger Wahlen
- Re: Libero setting from front zone "extension"
- From: Todd Haverkos
- Re: Libero setting from front zone "extension"
- From: Holger Wahlen
- Re: Libero setting from front zone "extension"
- From: Todd Haverkos
- Re: Libero setting from front zone "extension"
- From: Holger Wahlen
- Re: Libero setting from front zone "extension"
- From: Todd Haverkos
- Re: Libero setting from front zone "extension"
- From: Bruno Wolff III
- Libero setting from front zone "extension"
- Prev by Date: Re: Libero setting from front zone "extension"
- Next by Date: jammed finger - too late?
- Previous by thread: Re: Libero setting from front zone "extension"
- Next by thread: Lady Vols fan site
- Index(es):