Re: Loool....Mac today...



On 26/06/2011 10:39 PM, Sakari Lund wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:53:05 +1000, Whisper<beaver999@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On 26/06/2011 9:46 PM, Sakari Lund wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:31:47 +1000, Whisper<beaver999@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On 26/06/2011 7:51 AM, Carey wrote:


felangey wrote:
..."to be fair you have to say the win-loss record with Federer and Nadal is
misleading. You have to say that the reason Fed is so far behind Nadal is
because Roger has always been there to play Nadal in the finals....whereas
you can't say the same for Nadal against Roger. People tend to forget just
how good Roger has been".

:)

Very succinctly said by J-Mac. Uncharacteristic for him though. :)


No brainer really. Is this news to somebody?

Kind of sounds like it in rst that "to be fair you have to say the
win-loss record with Federer and Nadal is misleading" is news to lot
of people.



er, how is it misleading.....?

McEnroe said it is. You said "No brainer really. Is this news to
somebody?"

Make up your mind.


I agree with what Mac said, except the 'misleading' bit. He doesn't explain what he means there, & I genuinely have no idea. What exactly is 'misleading' about the h2h?

The way I see it had Rafa played his best more often & made even more finals v Roger, he'd just have more slam wins. What am I missing?

You're not seriously suggesting had Rafa made more slam finals, & played worse than Roger, Roger would have better h2h? Please tell me you're not thinking this way?

That applies to every player who ever lived.






.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: zoom vs reolution
    ... This is just another example of the kinds of misleading and deceptive ... the FZ18 +1.7 extender does not equal an 857 mm lens. ... You are correct, Roger. ... a restricted range of zoom - typically just at the long end of the zoom - ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Loool....Mac today...
    ... you can't say the same for Nadal against Roger. ... Is this news to somebody? ... win-loss record with Federer and Nadal is misleading" is news to lot ... You said "No brainer really. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: Feds loss to Djoker at AO....
    ... ..is actually a great result for Roger this yr, & a little misleading. ... Remember he really shoulda gone out 3rd rd v challenge-level player. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: Loool....Mac today...
    ... you can't say the same for Nadal against Roger. ... win-loss record with Federer and Nadal is misleading" is news to lot ... It just means it's harder for Rafa to play his best game as often as Fed plays his. ... This is because his game is much more demanding physically & mentally, whereas Fed coasts through on more natural ability. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: Loool....Mac today...
    ... felangey wrote: ... you can't say the same for Nadal against Roger. ... Is this news to somebody? ... win-loss record with Federer and Nadal is misleading" is news to lot ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)