Re: of course 911 was an inside job
- From: Whisper <beaver999@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 06:00:38 +1000
On 5/05/2011 3:54 AM, Scott wrote:
On May 4, 1:49 pm, "jdeluise"<jdelu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 4-May-2011, Scott<scott...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There are
NO parts of it that make ANY sense
So the towers still stand today, but they hired David Copperfield to have us
believe otherwise? Sounds plausible, but boy I worry about David's
health... it's been a long time now.
the official explanation of the events makes no sense, Vari. tough
concept for a G-Man (or G-Woman) to understand?
Thus it must make more sense the whole thing was faked, right?
Sounds logical. Because steel may not melt at the alleged temperatures, it must thus follow the whole thing was faked. Still hats off to them - to make all the other millions bits of 'moving parts' go off without a hitch is phenomenal.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: of course 911 was an inside job
- From: Scott
- Re: of course 911 was an inside job
- References:
- of course 911 was an inside job
- From: Scott
- Re: of course 911 was an inside job
- From: Scott
- Re: of course 911 was an inside job
- From: jdeluise
- Re: of course 911 was an inside job
- From: Scott
- of course 911 was an inside job
- Prev by Date: Re: Annoying match
- Next by Date: Re: Annoying match
- Previous by thread: Re: of course 911 was an inside job
- Next by thread: Re: of course 911 was an inside job
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|