Re: Rahim, are Sampras and Nadal in the same era?
- From: Whisper <beaver999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 19:34:55 +1000
jdeluise wrote:
On 6-May-2009, RahimAsif <RahimAsif@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 6, 6:24 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Well that is a poor measure because of course anyone answering theYou can take out the lying part by just asking yourself. And answering
question
could lie. Not to mention the scenario is so ridiculous there is hardly
any
pressure to answer correctly.
honestly...
Quality of play varies all the time, and since there would never be a case
where I would have to bet on a match to save my life I can't answer the
question. Lets just say that given the scorelines at Wimbledon and
Australian Open last year, Nadal would not be a lock for my bet on any
surface. I would certainly bet on Nadal on clay, but I wouldn't be
flabbergasted if Federer beat him (he has done it before after all).
How about being forced to bet 10K on Rafa v Fed? Who would you pick?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rahim, are Sampras and Nadal in the same era?
- From: jasoncatlin1971
- Re: Rahim, are Sampras and Nadal in the same era?
- References:
- Rahim, are Sampras and Nadal in the same era?
- From: jdeluise
- Re: Rahim, are Sampras and Nadal in the same era?
- From: Sakari Lund
- Re: Rahim, are Sampras and Nadal in the same era?
- From: RahimAsif
- Re: Rahim, are Sampras and Nadal in the same era?
- From: jdeluise
- Rahim, are Sampras and Nadal in the same era?
- Prev by Date: Re: Rahim, are Sampras and Nadal in the same era?
- Next by Date: Re: Boris Becker was a great player BUT
- Previous by thread: Re: Rahim, are Sampras and Nadal in the same era?
- Next by thread: Re: Rahim, are Sampras and Nadal in the same era?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading