Re: SUPER GOAT

On Feb 11, 2:17 am, Whisper <beaver...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
TennisGuy wrote:
The assumption that the so-called 'GOAT' must not be allowed to lose
to any other player regularly is absurd.

If ever a player like that existed they would have be a 'SUPER GOAT'
and I don't think we will live to see one in our lifetime.

They must not lose regularly to same guy in *slam finals*.  Tune-ups are
fine because no one remembers or gives a *** about them, & the top
players certainly aren't going to bust a gut in them when there is no
legacy reward.

Agreed - but Sampras shouldn't get too cozy, Nadal is marching at
record speed, and you cannot play the same card against him that you
did against Fed - after all Nadal has beaten Fed for all his slams,
and Fed is no clown...
.

Loading