Re: 4 straight W/USO combos ...

On 19 syys, 11:41, Whisper <beaver...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rodjk #613 wrote:
On Sep 17, 1:22 pm, "Vari L. Cinicke" <cini...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It pains me to see Sampras so often denigrated here; but I recognize
the intent of the post.
The intent is to point out to Whisper that his *arguments* are
foolish, but then end up being only criticisms of Pete.

Whisper is too much of a fool to understand the logic, and so nothing
is gained by using Pete in these discussions.

Rodjk #613

Translation :  I don't agree with Whisper so he must be a troll.
Nothing wrong with your ego.

I'm neither a fool nor weak in logic dept - indeed I've made quite a
handsome career out of my analytical skills.  That must mean I'm a troll.

Face it. You have numerous serious mishits as well.

Noone is perfect. I predicted F.Gonzales the next big thing based on
his 2002 and went totally wrong with Bagman...(he has great talent and
immaculate shotmaking skills but his beergut has kept it hidden pretty
well...)

What it is that every serious horse I pick they always are eventually
revealed as party animals/beerloving people with a work ethic next to
nil (Medvedev, Safin, Bagman, Nalbandian...)

..mikko

.

Loading