Re: Does this qualify as arrogance?
- From: Waleed.Khedr@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 28, 9:50 pm, RahimAsif <RahimA...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 28, 7:37 pm, Waleed.Kh...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jul 28, 2:35 pm, "arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
“I win on every surface, no? I win on grass, on hard, on indoor, and
on clay, too. So if I am playing my best tennis I can win on every
surface, no?” - Rafael Nadal, after beating Nicolas Kiefer to win the
Rogers Cup.
*****
What do the Rafa fans say?
Just give him another month and see how his language will change even
more.
Don't be ridiculous. Nothing in Rafa's demeanor says he will become
arrogant, and the above statement was just speaking the truth, nothing
remotely arrogant about it. If anything, I want Rafa to be even more
honest than humble, this whole schtick about how Federer is still the
best player in the world flies in the face of facts and is getting
frankly very old. That's one thing I liked about Federer, he was
honest even though at times it came across as proud and arrogant. I
have no use for false modesty...
Speaking the truth for some people means arrogant.
.
- References:
- Does this qualify as arrogance?
- From: arnab.z@gmail
- Re: Does this qualify as arrogance?
- From: Waleed . Khedr
- Re: Does this qualify as arrogance?
- From: RahimAsif
- Does this qualify as arrogance?
- Prev by Date: Re: Nalbandian is the only top 10 player Federer has beaten this year (not including retirements)
- Next by Date: Re: So Nadal surpasses Sampras on tms titles, Nadal 12 - Sampras 11
- Previous by thread: Re: Does this qualify as arrogance?
- Next by thread: Re: Does this qualify as arrogance?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
