Grass - bounce and speed
- From: topspin <goolagongfan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 05:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
I've seen lots of comments about bounce and speed. I'm not going to
get into arguments about whether it is fast or slow(!), but in my view
the physics is this:
Given a certain hardness of the surface, a dropped ball will bounce to
a certain height, irrespect of whether the surface is clay, grass, or
HC. It just depends on the firmness of the surface.
The same will be true of a moving ball. It will vary if the ball is
hit flat or with topspin, but if the shot(s) are the same for each
surface, the bounce height(s) will be the same
BUT
The friction of the surface will change the point at which the ball
reaches it's highest point. So on clay (highest friction) the ball
rears up steeply and gets to it's high point early. And on grass,
because friction is lowest, the ball shoots through and gets to its
(same) high point later. HC is in between.
In the past Wimbledon grass had a combination of both soft surface and
lower friction (especially after rain or in damp humid conditions), so
the ball bounced lower and shot through. IMO the surface is harder
than it used to be, so the bounce height is more similar to clay and
HC. IMO the high point is still later than HC. How much later - I
don't know, and I haven't seen any numbers.
So...of you are talking about your beliefs about grass you have to
separate the two aspects - bounce height and ball friction (-> speed).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Grass - bounce and speed
- From: Waleed . Khedr
- Re: Grass - bounce and speed
- From: bob
- Re: Grass - bounce and speed
- From: topspin
- Re: Grass - bounce and speed
- Prev by Date: Re: FEDERER 1 sampras 0
- Next by Date: Is anybody watching Gasquet
- Previous by thread: Some nice matches today
- Next by thread: Re: Grass - bounce and speed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|