Re: Just how good is Rafael Nadal?

On May 31, 7:21 am, "RuPEDski" <datacip...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:d5e8f9f2-9537-4ec2-9e9d-a89df64229ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



On May 31, 4:01 am, "RuPEDski" <datacip...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"robin" <robinson.n...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:6694ec66-37b5-4c2a-860e-b973ef0474c5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 30 May, 11:43, "arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 30, 12:28 pm, "RuPEDski" <datacip...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"stephenj" <s...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:tsH%j.96$pa2.42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

RuPEDski wrote:
<tennis41...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d9d3565a-c4a1-4867-9bd3-621ce35506cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On May 29, 3:15 pm, "arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Watching Nadal in his elements on clay is an awe-inspiring
sight. I
haven't seen such a package of stamina, determination, speed,
physical
aggression, mental strength, iron defense, court sense and a
sharp
mind always aware of the slightest of opportunities in a long
time.
He
is relentless, and he is still improving.

are you sure somebody hasn't hijacked your id? these lines under
you
id look totally out of place.

Not really. Arnab only cares about one "thing". All his posts are
related
to the thing. In this case, the idea is, if the thing cannot beat
Nadal,
then Nadal must indeed be by far the GOAT of clay because the
thing
would
surely have destroyed any other clay-courter in history.

at 100-2 and 3 straight FO titles, it really is hard to over-state
how
good nadal has been on clay.

Never said that he wasn't. He's had my respect for a long time.
However,
this is about Arnab and we all know what I said is true. And in
fact,
in
light of his recent "confession" he owes GroundAxe and many others
an
apology. LOL

? What the hell are you talking about, Giggles?

Maybe you have to apologise for admitting you were wrong about Nadal?

As you know full well, upstanding posters, like the aformentioned
Groundaxe, always show proper humilty when their predictions are found
to be wanting. You would do well to learn from their example.

LOL. I agree that Groundaxe is hardly a pinnacle of class, however, as
Arnab
admits, he's been very mistaken.

I said "Nadal has proven me wrong" in the figurative sense to mean
that even though I was aware of Nadal's success on clay at the time, I
didn't expect him to continue doing for four consecutive seasons on
clay. He has maintained his success and incorporated new elements to
his game. I still find his game quite bizarre and idiosyncratic, but
his success is undeniable, and he has earned my respect.

"Watching Nadal in his elements on clay is an awe-inspiring sight. I
haven't seen such a package of stamina, determination, speed, physical
aggression, mental strength, iron defense, court sense and a sharp
mind always aware of the slightest of opportunities in a long time. He
is relentless, and he is still improving."


Yes, this is the original post of this thread. Is there any reason why
you have copy-pasted in its entirety, when anyone with a minimum IQ
can look it up in seconds? Do you think you are accomplishing
something by doing this?

LOL. How to change your tune both from month to month and now from post to
post.


That is not evident at all. And no, copy-pasting portions of my posts
verbatim will not prove anything. Prove it in clear, logical English,
in your own words.

ps. Given the attributes you now rave about "stamina, determination, speed,
physical agression, mental strength, iron defense, court sense, sharp mind,
relentless and improving" have you revised your opinion that he has no
potential to do well in a HC slam? LOL

I haven't revised any such opinion. And what part of "Watching Nadal
in his elements **on clay**" as mentioned in the OP do you not
understand?

You still owe the ng an apology for this faux pas. We are waiting
patiently.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Just how good is Rafael Nadal?
    ... good nadal has been on clay. ... aggression, mental strength, iron defense, court sense and a sharp ... mind always aware of the slightest of opportunities in a long time. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: Just how good is Rafael Nadal?
    ... aggression, mental strength, iron defense, court sense and a sharp ... mind always aware of the slightest of opportunities in a long time. ... good nadal has been on clay. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: Just how good is Rafael Nadal?
    ... aggression, mental strength, iron defense, court sense and a sharp ... mind always aware of the slightest of opportunities in a long time. ... In this case, the idea is, if the thing cannot beat Nadal, then Nadal must indeed be by far the GOAT of clay because the thing would surely have destroyed any other clay-courter in history. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: Just how good is Rafael Nadal?
    ... aggression, mental strength, iron defense, court sense and a sharp ... mind always aware of the slightest of opportunities in a long time. ... In this case, the idea is, if the thing cannot beat Nadal, then Nadal must indeed be by far the GOAT of clay because the thing would surely have destroyed any other clay-courter in history. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: Just how good is Rafael Nadal?
    ... good nadal has been on clay. ... aggression, mental strength, iron defense, court sense and a sharp ... mind always aware of the slightest of opportunities in a long time. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)