Re: don't understand why the great claycourter like Nadal
- From: "andrew.reys@xxxxxxxxx" <andrew.reys@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 14:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
On May 28, 1:49 pm, al...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
andrew.r...@xxxxxxxxx
You're more than free to actually prove me wrong rather than waste time
with silly ad hominems which suggest that you don't, in fact, have an
argument to refute the point above. Take your time. Available evidence
points to you needing it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You mean like proving you're wrong about
light rackets having more power than heavy ones?
Or your contention that loose strings produce
more spin?
You've got a LOT of chutzpah posting that
BS when you've NEVER admitted you were
wrong on both accounts. (just slinging a lot
of ad hominems because you couldn't refute
the point)
Everytime I read your posts, I have to wonder,
do you even play Tennis?
Funny, to date you've yet to actually prove any of your contentions.
Moreover, the majority of your claims - such as that heavy racquets
are inherently more powerful - are so simplistic with regards to
determining factors as to cast doubt that you have the intelligence to
recognize any supporting evidence you might encounter, which could
certainly explain the lack of said evidence here.
Shall we consider some of the contentions you've made that are
hilariously and obviously wrong, or which have been proven to be thus
since? You claimed that Serena Williams didn't work out at the gym or
do strength training. You claimed that the ball has a longer dwell
time on tighter strings - something which has actually been proven to
be wrong through, you know, scientific research. You claimed that
"unsurprisingly" is not a word. You claimed that Federer and Sampras
only hit the ball so hard because their racquet is heavy. I honestly
can't do anything but LOL when reading most of your posts. So I guess
if your goal when you first started posting was to become the
laughingstock of RST, you've succeeded beautifully.
The day you actually post evidence to prove or in any way support the
asinine claims you keep on making, maybe I'll do something besides
giggle at your futile attempts to sound knowledgeable and intelligent.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: don't understand why the great claycourter like Nadal
- From: andrew.reys@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: don't understand why the great claycourter like Nadal
- From: allr1
- Re: don't understand why the great claycourter like Nadal
- Prev by Date: Re: How does he do that?
- Next by Date: Re: Not that Roger is too bothered about this, but when he wins this next match,
- Previous by thread: Re: don't understand why the great claycourter like Nadal
- Next by thread: Re: don't understand why the great claycourter like Nadal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
