Re: Henin: her all-time rank

robin wrote:
On 16 May, 20:32, stephenj <s...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Vari L. Cinicke wrote:
stephenj wrote:
robin wrote:
On 15 May, 13:48, stephenj <s...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
hint: that's because you're no smarter than he is and thus very much
underqualified to make an assessment.
I'm sure, in you mind, these childish evasion tactics
lol. you reveal your dumbness by flattering yourself that you have
made arguments worth the trouble of 'evading'.
barrow is clearly more knowledgeable about math and science than
yourself, thus it's no surprise you can't come up with an argument
worth spending more than 5 dismissive seconds on.
sorry about that ...
I am glad that you are not bothering to hide the fact that you have
nothing intelligent or intelligible to say in response.
dude, since 'robin' posted gibberish, how can one respond intelligently?


Sigh. That fact that you seem incapable of understanding my rebuttal
to your position, does not qualify it as 'gibberish'.

it's the fact that your rebuttal (rofl!) is gibberish that qualifies it as gibberish.

--
Science is based on mathematics;
mathematics cannot discover all truths;
therefore science cannot discover all truths.

- John Barrow
.