Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- From: robin <robinson.neil@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 06:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
On 15 May, 13:48, stephenj <s...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
hint: that's because you're no smarter than he is and thus very much
underqualified to make an assessment.
I'm sure, in you mind, these childish evasion tactics are very
effective. Believe me, they really aren't. If you can't answer the
objections raised, which is clearly the case here, then you should
concede the point. That is hardly a difficult concept to grasp; I'm
surprised someone of you *alleged* high IQ is struggling with it...
Now here's a hint for you: if you flunked at school so badly that you
don't even know the basics of the scientific method, you should avoid
getting into discussions about what science is or is not.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- From: stephenj
- Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- References:
- Henin: her all-time rank
- From: stephenj
- Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- From: Patrick Kehoe
- Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- From: stephenj
- Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- From: Joe Ramirez
- Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- From: stephenj
- Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- From: Joe Ramirez
- Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- From: stephenj
- Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- From: robin
- Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- From: stephenj
- Henin: her all-time rank
- Prev by Date: Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- Next by Date: Re: Starace-Nadal
- Previous by thread: Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- Next by thread: Re: Henin: her all-time rank
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|