Re: Is the FO more important to Federer than Wimbledon now? Federer says
- From: Fan <TurnagainArm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 21, 6:59 am, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:49:04 -0700 (PDT), Fan
<Turnagain...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 21, 6:08 am, wkhedr <wkh...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Wimbledon is always No. 1 in my heart, that will never change," he
said. "But I'm obviously aware of the potential of the one I haven't
won yet and for this reason it would probably create bigger news
around the world than Wimbledon. But probably not in my heart."
I would tell Roger not to pee on my leg and try to tell me that it is
raining.
He wants the French Open more than anything else does. He has a
handful of Wimbledon and one more or less would make no difference but
French would set him up as the greatest tennis player of all times.
Realistically, what else could he say? He would be crazy to say that
winning at French is more important than Wimbledon, knowing that he
has little chance at the French.
and every chance of winning 7 W's in a row.
It would be something! Agassi was a two time French Open finalist
before winning the French and Roger has made it to the finals two
times also. He has a chance and may be worth trying. Hard to tell. It
was a lot easier decision for Sampras to "sour grapes" the French
because he had absolutely no chance of winning the French. He
concentrated on HC & GC slams. It worked out for him.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Davydenko is an RST Fan
- Next by Date: Re: Which of these players is the odd one out?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is the FO more important to Federer than Wimbledon now? Federer says
- Next by thread: Re: Is the FO more important to Federer than Wimbledon now? Federer says
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
