Re: battle of the surfaces: someone has a patent on this!
- From: JTPDC@xxxxxxxxx (John P)
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:39:40 -0400
Robin wrote:
"Really, I don't think that you should be able to patent obvious ideas."
well, by statute and caselaw definition you can't patent obvious ideas.
Robin wrote:
"How many people have had the thought of a dual surface over the years?"
presumably zero, unless you have evidence - EVIDENCE - to the contrary.
Do you? of course not.
Robin wrote:
"It's not exactly up there with Einstein's Relativity as an orignal
piece of theory."
very few, if any, things are. doesn't mean it's not patentable, as
evidenced by millions of patents. and where is the EVIDENCE that it's
not an original idea? if this person wasn't the first person to think
of it, pray tell, who was?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Sampras did not bagel McEnroe...
- Next by Date: Re: Wimbledon "is the oldest, the most famous and certainly the most prestigious tennis tournament in the world"
- Previous by thread: Re: battle of the surfaces: someone has a patent on this!
- Next by thread: Re: battle of the surfaces: someone has a patent on this!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
