Re: so how do you beat Rafa on clay?

On May 5, 2:14 pm, Whisper <beaver...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sao Paulo Swallow wrote:
On May 4, 2:04 pm, "arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 5, 2:33 am, Joe Ramirez <josephmrami...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 4, 3:34 pm, Sao Paulo Swallow <Sao_Paulo_Swal...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On May 4, 12:04 pm, gregor...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Too close to Wimbledon - we've all agreed on this so no point rehashing.
By "we've all agreed" you mean "I've convinced myself" ...
"We've all agreed" is one of Whisper's most Orwellian stock responses;
what it really means is, "Almost everyone here has rejected this
argument as a load of crap, but I've got nothing else, so I'm going to
repeat it ...." His "big lie" technique is so outrageous and absurd he
figures no one will bother to call him on it.
Joe Ramirez
Calling Whisper is a waste a time - he ignores rational arguments and
continues along his merry way regardless.
It's impossible to fight the sheer deluge of posts retiterating the
same stuff so the result is that people give up trying.
Yet, oddly, people *don't* stop trying. Inexplicable.
There's an apocryphal story about a composer -- maybe Chopin, or
perhaps Beethoven before his lost his hearing; I've also heard it
applied to the pianist Rubinstein -- who wouldn't come out of his
room. Simply refused. So, the person seeking his attention played an
unresolved chord on the piano outside the room. The dissonance hanging
in the air was intolerable to the composer, so he finally stormed out
of the room to play the resolution himself.
Sensitivity sometimes forces you to take action. :)
Joe Ramirez
Yes, it's entirely human to react to pests like Whimper. It's like
living in a tropical home and treating cockroaches crawling all over
the room. You can choose to be "big" and ignore them, but really,
sometimes when they start multiplying and flying around too much, you
gotta put on the big boots and stomp 'em out, fully knowing that they
will come back again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No it isn't. It's a sign of insanity: doing the same thing over and
over expecting different results.

Kinda amusing listenting to a small bunch of rst clowns who really are
clueless when it come to tennis analysis. If I'm wrong in my arguments
then it should be easy to beat me down with logic/facts - you can't do
it because you got nothing.

Partially right, we got nothing to beat your sorry ass out of this ng.
You're the clingy loser in denial that won't go away...the lowest form
of usenet existence, the uber-troll.

.

Loading