Re: USO - beginning of Nadal's domination?
- From: "Carey" <carey_1959@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Jul 2006 13:26:31 -0700
Whisper wrote:
Vari L. Cinicke wrote:
Jughead wrote:
scottl44@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
i keep thinking about how quickly Rafael Nadal has risen in the tennis
ranks. He's 20. Owns two Slams. Just made the Wimbledon finals. (He
could have easily gone to a fifth set at W.) Has a dominating H2H
versus Federer.
How could he have easily gone to a fifth set?. Fed was in control of
the set and though he got broken once, didn't seem like he was going to
lose the set.
-Aravind
<snip>
The rules are different in coulda-woulda land. There Nadal shoulda won
the 2nd set and coulda won the 3rd set and the match woulda gone to a 5th.
Kind of like the coulda-woulda land where Federer shoulda won Dubai in
straights and won Rome and who know what else.
Only a fool thinks Nadal couldn't have beaten Fed in Wimbledon final.
A meaningless assertion. The Whiskerian specialty!
.
- References:
- USO - beginning of Nadal's domination?
- From: scottl44
- Re: USO - beginning of Nadal's domination?
- From: Jughead
- Re: USO - beginning of Nadal's domination?
- From: Vari L. Cinicke
- Re: USO - beginning of Nadal's domination?
- From: Whisper
- USO - beginning of Nadal's domination?
- Prev by Date: Re: Gaby & Steffi!
- Next by Date: Re: I'm off to play some tennis...
- Previous by thread: Re: USO - beginning of Nadal's domination?
- Next by thread: Re: USO - beginning of Nadal's domination?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
