Re: "dominance" defined
- From: Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kahuna@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:19:23 GMT
On 14 Jul 2006 08:08:40 -0700, "joliehuis" <louisheij@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yes, 7543.
gimme one reason why ATP has not adopted your flawless system yet?
Because you can go decades without seeing anyone cracking tier 2 - fans
want to see more immediate rankings.
But still they could use 7543 within a 12-month frame.
7543 is a joke. don't go boosting whispers already bloated ego.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "dominance" defined
- From: joliehuis
- Re: "dominance" defined
- References:
- Re: "dominance" defined
- From: stephenj
- Re: "dominance" defined
- From: joliehuis
- Re: "dominance" defined
- From: Dave Hazelwood
- Re: "dominance" defined
- From: joliehuis
- Re: "dominance" defined
- From: Whisper
- Re: "dominance" defined
- From: joliehuis
- Re: "dominance" defined
- From: Whisper
- Re: "dominance" defined
- From: joliehuis
- Re: "dominance" defined
- Prev by Date: Re: These two kidnapped Israeli soldiers must be sons of powerful families eh ?
- Next by Date: Re: Sampras lucky in the autumn of his career?
- Previous by thread: Re: "dominance" defined
- Next by thread: Re: "dominance" defined
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading