Re: Sampras played in toughest era ever - proof.
- From: Sakari Lund <sakari.lund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:38:41 +0200
On 31 Jan 2006 12:33:35 -0800, "robin" <robinson.neil@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>8
>http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/tennis/history?type=men
According to Whisper Lendl won 7 slams, and apparently with the same
logic Mauresmo hasn't won a slam. Although he has never used the same
logic in two different cases...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sampras played in toughest era ever - proof.
- From: Whisper
- Re: Sampras played in toughest era ever - proof.
- References:
- Sampras played in toughest era ever - proof.
- From: Whisper
- Re: Sampras played in toughest era ever - proof.
- From: Mikko Ämmälä
- Re: Sampras played in toughest era ever - proof.
- From: Whisper
- Re: Sampras played in toughest era ever - proof.
- From: robin
- Re: Sampras played in toughest era ever - proof.
- From: Whisper
- Re: Sampras played in toughest era ever - proof.
- From: robin
- Sampras played in toughest era ever - proof.
- Prev by Date: Re: Federer puts focus on French
- Next by Date: Re: ATP - Greatest Peak in the Open Era
- Previous by thread: Re: Sampras played in toughest era ever - proof.
- Next by thread: Re: Sampras played in toughest era ever - proof.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
