Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- From: Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kahuna@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:21:16 +0800
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:16:44 GMT, "Dr. GroundAxe" <groundaxe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:06:26 GMT, "Dr. GroundAxe" <groundaxe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:41:56 GMT, "Dr. GroundAxe" <groundaxe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:28:15 GMT, "Dr. GroundAxe" <groundaxe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:16:26 GMT, "Dr. GroundAxe" <groundaxe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:06:42 GMT, "Dr. GroundAxe" <groundaxe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> greg.orawe@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadal as being a doubtful attendee of the AO not suggest something to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you about the credibility of information suggesting he is? A story that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if true would pretty much end Nadal's career has gone unreported by all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> major news outlets!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Who said anything about it ending his career?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought it said that he had recovered from the original foot injury
>>>>>>>>>>>> but that he was playing with insoles to help his feet. This had led to
>>>>>>>>>>>> him straining his calf muscles as he had to move slightly differently
>>>>>>>>>>>> when using them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Strained muscles are not as far as I know a career-ending injury. The
>>>>>>>>>>>> problem is that there may not be enough time for these to heal for him
>>>>>>>>>>>> to play Sydney the week after next. If he misses Sydney then he is
>>>>>>>>>>>> unlikely to play the AO without a warmup event.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But this is not definite - he may still be fit to play the AO (as I
>>>>>>>>>>>> said originally) ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh but he has arthritis now apparently. His legs have also fallen off. I
>>>>>>>>>>> don't know why you and Hazelnut set yourselves up to look so stupid time
>>>>>>>>>>> and time again.
>>>>>>>>>> when he doesn't play the AO you are the one going to look stupid. i will
>>>>>>>>>> be hailed as a great seer.
>>>>>>>>> You mean like when you 'predcicted' he would lose at every stage of his
>>>>>>>>> progression through the Madrid masters draw? Or him never winning a slam
>>>>>>>>> and so on.
>>>>>>>> i didn't say he wud lose at every stage. i also never said he would never
>>>>>>>> win a slam.
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.sport.tennis/browse_thread/thread/2fcf1a2fc7a6e764/c952feed421ae0c7?q=hazelwood+madrid+masters&rnum=9#c952feed421ae0c7
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.sport.tennis/browse_thread/thread/26301bd79d56c804/53e3bbddf07f4de4?q=nadal+madrid+masters&rnum=10#53e3bbddf07f4de4
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.sport.tennis/browse_thread/thread/fa182dfcf3324eb0/f3674cff453b4e8a?q=nadal+madrid+masters&rnum=3#f3674cff453b4e8a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> sorry this is not EVERY stage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and, this is when he hurt his foot. he had to bumroot himself to death to beat lubo and injured himself and maybe ended his career.
>>>>>> i consider that a loss. winning a match you shud have lost and in order to do so injure yourself so you miss yec, chennai and AO and
>>>>>> maybe your career is a net loss.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You said Hanescu would bagel Nadal ffs. That's just total retarded
>>>>> fanboyism. Then you proceeded to pin your hopes on every other player he
>>>>> met.Most laughably you got ahead of yourself when he was playing
>>>>> Ljubicic and had already declared him the winner, how annoyed you were
>>>>> when Nadal turned things around.
>>>>
>>>> yes he did turn it around at the expense of serious injury that has kept
>>>> him out of tennis since then and maybe end his career.
>>>>
>>>> smart ?
>>>
>>>
>>> What injury that may end his career? No news sites are reporting this.
>>
>>
>> i am reporting it. that should be good enough.
>
>
>
>Chicken Licken has more credibility than you.
we shall see. if i am wrong i will take the heat. if i am right will you give me
credit ?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- From: Dr. GroundAxe
- Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- References:
- Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- From: Dave Hazelwood
- Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- From: Dr. GroundAxe
- Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- From: Dave Hazelwood
- Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- From: Dr. GroundAxe
- Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- From: Dave Hazelwood
- Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- From: Dr. GroundAxe
- Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- From: Dave Hazelwood
- Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- From: Dr. GroundAxe
- Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- From: Dave Hazelwood
- Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- From: Dr. GroundAxe
- Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- Prev by Date: Re: Nadal may not be fit for AO - Uncle Toni
- Next by Date: Re: Federer dominated tennis
- Previous by thread: Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- Next by thread: Re: Does the fact that the MSM have not reported...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|