Re: Curious Notes on the WTA Year-End #1
- From: "Robert B. Waltz" <waltzmn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:53:46 -0600
pedrodias@xxxxxxxx wrote:
[ ... ]
> I could like balance - if it meant great players standing toe-to-toe
> and duking it out to a season-ending wire.
>
> I could live with a Tour in transition, where the fairly good trade
> wins and we wait to see who comes out on top, or whether greatness
> emerges from the pack.
>
> This Parade of the Damaged, the Near-Dead and the Quasi-Retired the WTA
> has turned into... This I find singularly charmless.
That about sums up my feelings. Balance as a result of
different players winning by bringing different things to
the court is one thing. Balance as a result of everyone
playing the same way and collapsing at about the same
frequency isn't worth the bother.
--
The fundamental division of powers in the Constitution of the
United States is between voters on the one hand and property
owners on the other. -- Arthur Twining Hadley, 1908
(Quoted in Alpheus Thomas Mason, _The Supreme Court_)
.
- References:
- Curious Notes on the WTA Year-End #1
- From: Robert B. Waltz
- Re: Curious Notes on the WTA Year-End #1
- From: Sakari Lund
- Re: Curious Notes on the WTA Year-End #1
- From: Robert B. Waltz
- Re: Curious Notes on the WTA Year-End #1
- From: mimus
- Re: Curious Notes on the WTA Year-End #1
- From: Robert B. Waltz
- Re: Curious Notes on the WTA Year-End #1
- From: pedrodias
- Curious Notes on the WTA Year-End #1
- Prev by Date: Re: Strong stomach required
- Next by Date: Re: Curious Notes on the WTA Year-End #1
- Previous by thread: Re: Curious Notes on the WTA Year-End #1
- Next by thread: Re: Curious Notes on the WTA Year-End #1
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
