Re: 3km
- From: "Micheal Artindale" <micheal.artindale@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:32:48 -0500
"Martin Smith" <sleepless@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:11ta3c3b979vl8a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Micheal Artindale wrote:
>
> > "jtaylor" <jtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:zl4Bf.9846$43.5237@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx!nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> >
> >>"Martin Smith" <sleepless@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >>news:11t8rbisgpi4ra4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>>Micheal Artindale wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I finally did 3km in 2 hrs.
> >>>>
> >>>>Was it due to the drills? Was it due to something else?
> >>>>
> >>>>I dont know, all I do know is that in 2hrs, I did 3 km.
> >>>
> >>>Without stopping?
> >>>
> >>>That means you can probably do 5k in 4 hours. Only 3k more to squeeze
> >
> > in.
> >
> >>No.
> >>
> >>3 plus 3 is 6.
> >>
> >
> > So, it wasnt just me who could not figure out that math equation?
> >
> > I dont feel so bad.
>
> What does 3 + 3 refer to?
>
> I said if you can do 3k in 2hrs, then you can probably do 5k in 4hrs. 5k
> + 3k is 8k. That means you still have to increase your average speed
> enough to squeeze 3k more into 4hrs.
Actually, lets do some math i did 4km in 2.75 hrs, so, to do 8km at roughly
that speed is = 5.5 hrs
Now, I did 3km in 2 hrs, using that number, 8km at that speed is = 5.33 hrs
I can do the math, it seams Mr. Smith, you cannot.
>
> Now you probably feel a lot worse.
>
Nope. I feel great, aside from the soreness
Micheal
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3km
- From: Martin Smith
- Re: 3km
- References:
- Prev by Date: I can feel the 3km
- Next by Date: Re: 3km
- Previous by thread: Re: 3km
- Next by thread: Re: 3km
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|