Re: hardest set?
- From: "Jeffrey T. Spaulding" <explorer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:08:46 +0200
In article <1122666736.347196.42620@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Man o' Tea" <dlfagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Al Spohn wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not sure that this would compare,
> > > > but it's impressive to me even to
> > > > this day - back in Mike Bruner's day
> > > > I think he did 100 x 100m on 1:00.
>
> Jeffrey T. Spaulding wrote:
>
> > ... he held a 50 second pace, so he got a
> > whole ten seconds rest each time.
>
> So, by resting between hundreds, he could
> swim the first 15 x 100m, 1500m, in 14'50",
> then rest another ten seconds and keep
> going another 8500m at the same pace, at a
> time when the 1500m WR was 15'02"?
15 x 50 is 12:30, not 14:50.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hardest set?
- From: Man o' Tea
- Re: hardest set?
- References:
- hardest set?
- From: Adam Brown
- Re: hardest set?
- From: Mark P
- Re: hardest set?
- From: Al Spohn
- Re: hardest set?
- From: Man o' Tea
- Re: hardest set?
- From: Jeffrey T. Spaulding
- Re: hardest set?
- From: Man o' Tea
- hardest set?
- Prev by Date: Re: hardest set?
- Next by Date: Re: hardest set?
- Previous by thread: Re: hardest set?
- Next by thread: Re: hardest set?
- Index(es):