Re: Man United

On 7/12/2011 11:54 AM, Diabolik wrote:
"Abubakr"<deltarasha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ivf7d0$fp2$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 7/10/2011 11:49 AM, Diabolik wrote:

"Abubakr"<deltarasha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ivb053$3vh$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 7/10/2011 11:37 AM, Diabolik wrote:

"Abubakr"<deltarasha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ivav8d$eiu$5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 7/10/2011 11:21 AM, Diabolik wrote:

"Abubakr"<deltarasha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ivau93$eiu$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 7/10/2011 10:23 AM, Alkamista wrote:
On Jul 9, 7:54 pm, Abubakr<deltara...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 7/10/2011 9:03 AM, Google Beta User wrote:

Is Ferguson on a berserker rage? It's almost like it's a pointed
message to City and LFC who exactly the top dog is (yes I know
City
and Chelsea are title rivals too--but it's LFC and City that are
making major rebuilding intents). Also perhaps he wants to go out
after vanquishing Barcelona.

He ain't going to vanquish Barcelona by the additions of Young, De
Gea
and Jones when the Catalans are going to add Fàbregas, Sanchez and
Neymar. lol

Neymar is going to RM and Fabragas is far from a foregone
conclusion.
Only Sanchez looks like a sure bet for them right now. They also
need
a find a replacement/backup for Tarzan very soon, better than
Milito.

It looks like Barcelona are very much in the hunt for Neymar now as
well though I don't see the wisdom in getting him if they land
Sanchez
or vice versa.

Neymar's going to RM.

Cesc could go there or not, I'd say it's 50-50 whether he does
either.
As to the defence, common sense would say they need reinforcements
but
they hadn't exactly done badly against Man Utd in recent years with
a
plethora of defenders out going into those games.

Barca *really* needs reinforcements in midfield this year, they are
getting old.

Where you going? This is coming from a guy who thinks Milan are going
places with their current geriatric midfield?

Stop lying, I never suggested that. Milan are getting reinforcements
this
year in all departments with young players.



Xavi is 30 and is moving better than ever. The rest of the midfield
are
also in their prime.


Xavi is *31*. Yeah... one year makes a difference at that age.

Xavi is in his prime at 31? I think you're 5 years late. They really
need a backup for him.

Yes, 31 is prime for a player like Xavi who is least least reliant on
speed.

You expect me to believe this? Please...

Believe what you want to believe. But the facts are simple.

Facts according to you?

The facts in your own head don't match the REAL facts.


Xavi IS in
his prime.

Xavi is 31 and is going downhill, so they need a backup.

You can always keep your hopes up by deluding yourself...

Nobody was speaking of Xavi as one of the best players in the
world 5 or 6 years ago, because he wasn't.

Because Messi wasn't there to make him look great.

Messi wasn't there to make him look good in Euro 2008 (aged 28) and WC 2010 (aged 30) either but it didn't make an ounce of difference.

They do now, because he is.

He has alwasy been the same player, he just has much better players around
him now to make him look great.

Yes he's still got the same name but he's a much better player now than ever. Only an idiot who is clueless about the game would think otherwise.

Nobody was speaking much about Zidane when he was 25 either.

Bwahahaha....are you kidding? You expect me to beleive this crap? You must
be living under a rock.

France won the WC in 98 and Zidane just turned 26. He was man of the match
in the final and scored 2 gols.

Yes he was man of the match in the WC final but nobody in their right mind considered him the best player in the world yet.

He won 2 scudetti with Juve and was twice runners up of the CL in 97 and 98.

These are facts, written in history. It's not facts based on your emotions.

Yes he did. But he didn't reach his personal best until after the 98 WC.

They
couldn't stop speaking about him when he was 28-32.

That's because we was with RM. So? Doesn't mean he wasn't good before that.

No, because he was undoubtedly the best player in the world by then. He was good at 18 years of age as well, doesn't mean he was at his best yet.

This is just elementary logic. I can't believe that I have to constantly teach it to you.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Man United
    ... message to City and LFC who exactly the top dog is (yes I know ... Xavi is 30 and is moving better than ever. ... But the facts are simple. ... You're a deluded fool to think that a football player is in his prime at 31, ...
    (rec.sport.soccer)
  • [Review] Die Saulon von Venedig
    ... The city is lovely, with great architecture, romantic ... assortment of pillar markers, and five cards. ... The most common characters allow the player to ... the card played will depict the number of pillars ...
    (rec.games.board)
  • Re: Symonds team-mates
    ... Symonds is a talented but troubled player. ... see how the facts of the matter show he's troubled by anything else. ... A member of the team who has had other rifts (one leading ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • Use-the-Net EPL - Round 33 (Apr 18-22)
    ... drop one player and pick one free player instead of him; ... Bargearse FC - Ixion ... Stoke City vs. Blackburn ... Table 2 = Points in the best lossless streak (current streak between ...
    (rec.sport.soccer)
  • Re: The time has come
    ... Reg LeCrisp wrote: ... Actually all I am trying to do is warn other players of Windsors scamming ways. ... If you were a veteran UO player and got sucked in by another supposed Noob only to find out later he has been playing UO for 6 years, ... The facts there as you call them are NOT the facts that you stated. ...
    (rec.games.computer.ultima.online)