Re: (OT) Who owns my posts?
- From: "Robert Moir" <robspamtrap+usenet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:26:48 GMT
Victoria Barrett wrote:
If they were copywritten pieces of work, when Dejanews "sold" their
archives of USENET to Google, wouldn't they have had to ask each and
every one of us, for permission in transferring the right of
publication to Google?
It's generally assumed that when you knowingly post to a public forum of
some kind that you are making an implied licence to the operators of that
forum to take all actions consistent with using your post in the way you
intended when you made the post. (hence storing it for publication in the
news feeds, etc).
I think it could be argued, if you're not one of these people who
aren't hampered by the whole "for profit" argument (which is a stealth
angle for those uneasy with free-markets to begin with), that Google
perform a public service by conserving for us, the writers, our
thoughts on a given day.
It isn't a public service. It's a 'for profit' operation.
.
- References:
- (OT) Who owns my posts?
- From: alkamista
- Re: (OT) Who owns my posts?
- From: Victoria Barrett
- Re: (OT) Who owns my posts?
- From: Jussi Uosukainen
- Re: (OT) Who owns my posts?
- From: Victoria Barrett
- (OT) Who owns my posts?
- Prev by Date: Re: (OT) Who owns my posts?
- Next by Date: Re: Manchester United v. Celtic [R, CL 2006-7]
- Previous by thread: Re: (OT) Who owns my posts?
- Next by thread: Re: (OT) Who owns my posts?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|